Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improved Integrality Gap in Max-Min Allocation: or Topology at the North Pole

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.01143 v3 pith:JLNWOXVW submitted 2022-02-02 cs.DS cs.DM

Improved Integrality Gap in Max-Min Allocation: or Topology at the North Pole

classification cs.DS cs.DM
keywords integralityproblemallocationmax-minresourcesrestrictedalgorithmsapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the max-min allocation problem a set $P$ of players are to be allocated disjoint subsets of a set $R$ of indivisible resources, such that the minimum utility among all players is maximized. We study the restricted variant, also known as the Santa Claus problem, where each resource has an intrinsic positive value, and each player covets a subset of the resources. Bez\'akov\'a and Dani showed that this problem is NP-hard to approximate within a factor less than $2$, consequently a great deal of work has focused on approximate solutions. The principal approach for obtaining approximation algorithms has been via the Configuration LP (CLP) of Bansal and Sviridenko. Accordingly, there has been much interest in bounding the integrality gap of this CLP. The existing algorithms and integrality gap estimations are all based one way or another on the combinatorial augmenting tree argument of Haxell for finding perfect matchings in certain hypergraphs. Our main innovation in this paper is to introduce the use of topological methods for the restricted max-min allocation problem, to replace the combinatorial argument. This approach yields substantial improvements in the integrality gap of the CLP. In particular we improve the previously best known bound of $3.808$ to $3.534$. We also study the $(1,\varepsilon)$-restricted version, in which resources can take only two values, and improve the integrality gap in most cases.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.