Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Iterates of the Frank-Wolfe Algorithm May Not Converge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.08711 v1 pith:FUKGUHTP submitted 2022-02-17 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords convergencemathbbalgorithmbehaviorconvexcounterexamplesfrank-wolfefunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The Frank-Wolfe algorithm is a popular method for minimizing a smooth convex function $f$ over a compact convex set $\mathcal{C}$. While many convergence results have been derived in terms of function values, hardly nothing is known about the convergence behavior of the sequence of iterates $(x_t)_{t\in\mathbb{N}}$. Under the usual assumptions, we design several counterexamples to the convergence of $(x_t)_{t\in\mathbb{N}}$, where $f$ is $d$-time continuously differentiable, $d\geq2$, and $f(x_t)\to\min_\mathcal{C}f$. Our counterexamples cover the cases of open-loop, closed-loop, and line-search step-size strategies. We do not assume \emph{misspecification} of the linear minimization oracle and our results thus hold regardless of the points it returns, demonstrating the fundamental pathologies in the convergence behavior of $(x_t)_{t\in\mathbb{N}}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools