Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comment on "Explaining the specific heat of liquids based on instantaneous normal modes"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.05318 v2 pith:GNABF2XC submitted 2022-03-10 cond-mat.dis-nn

Comment on "Explaining the specific heat of liquids based on instantaneous normal modes"

classification cond-mat.dis-nn
keywords heatliquidsspecificdebyeformulaliquidrepresentspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In a recent paper (Phys. Rev. E {\bf 104}, 014103 (2021) ) M. Baggioli and A. Zaccone formulate a theoretical description of the specific heat of liquids by using Debye's expression for the specific heat of solids and inserting a density of states (DOS) which they claim to represent the instantaneous-normal-mode (INM) spectrum of a liquid. However, the quantum-mechanical procedure of Debye cannot be used for a classical liquid and the authors' formula for the INM spectrum does not represent the known INM spectra of simple liquids. Furthermore, the derivation of this formula from their model equation of motion is mathematically in error. Finally experimental test of the teory for the specific heat of {\it liquids} is performed by fitting the data of {\it supercritical fluids}. \new{To our opinion,} these and a lot of other inconsistencies render this work not suitable for studying the specific heat of liquids.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.