Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bidding and Scheduling in Energy Markets: Which Probabilistic Forecast Do We Need?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.13159 v1 pith:XUHUENKA submitted 2022-03-24 eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC

classification eess.SYcs.SYmath.OC
keywords energybiddingdistributionsforecastcasesexpectedfullinstances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Probabilistic forecasting in combination with stochastic programming is a key tool for handling the growing uncertainties in future energy systems. Derived from a general stochastic programming formulation for the optimal scheduling and bidding in energy markets we examine several common special instances containing uncertain loads, energy prices, and variable renewable energies. We analyze for each setup whether only an expected value forecast, marginal or bivariate predictive distributions, or the full joint predictive distribution is required. For market schedule optimization, we find that expected price forecasts are sufficient in almost all cases, while the marginal distributions of renewable energy production and demand are often required. For bidding curve optimization, pairwise or full joint distributions are necessary except for specific cases. This work helps practitioners choose the simplest type of forecast that can still achieve the best theoretically possible result for their problem and researchers to focus on the most relevant instances.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools