Pith. sign in

REVIEW

RSCFed: Random Sampling Consensus Federated Semi-supervised Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.13993 v1 pith:DNUMCLJF submitted 2022-03-26 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords clientsmodelsrandomconsensusfederatedlabeledlearningmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated semi-supervised learning (FSSL) aims to derive a global model by training fully-labeled and fully-unlabeled clients or training partially labeled clients. The existing approaches work well when local clients have independent and identically distributed (IID) data but fail to generalize to a more practical FSSL setting, i.e., Non-IID setting. In this paper, we present a Random Sampling Consensus Federated learning, namely RSCFed, by considering the uneven reliability among models from fully-labeled clients, fully-unlabeled clients or partially labeled clients. Our key motivation is that given models with large deviations from either labeled clients or unlabeled clients, the consensus could be reached by performing random sub-sampling over clients. To achieve it, instead of directly aggregating local models, we first distill several sub-consensus models by random sub-sampling over clients and then aggregating the sub-consensus models to the global model. To enhance the robustness of sub-consensus models, we also develop a novel distance-reweighted model aggregation method. Experimental results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods on three benchmarked datasets, including both natural and medical images. The code is available at https://github.com/XMed-Lab/RSCFed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools