REVIEW 1 cited by
Synthetic Graph Generation to Benchmark Graph Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Graph learning algorithms have attained state-of-the-art performance on many graph analysis tasks such as node classification, link prediction, and clustering. It has, however, become hard to track the field's burgeoning progress. One reason is due to the very small number of datasets used in practice to benchmark the performance of graph learning algorithms. This shockingly small sample size (~10) allows for only limited scientific insight into the problem. In this work, we aim to address this deficiency. We propose to generate synthetic graphs, and study the behaviour of graph learning algorithms in a controlled scenario. We develop a fully-featured synthetic graph generator that allows deep inspection of different models. We argue that synthetic graph generations allows for thorough investigation of algorithms and provides more insights than overfitting on three citation datasets. In the case study, we show how our framework provides insight into unsupervised and supervised graph neural network models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Synthetic Tabular Data: Methods, Attacks and Defenses
A review of tabular synthetic data generation, privacy attacks, and defenses, whose central message is that synthetic data alone does not guarantee privacy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.