Pith. sign in

REVIEW

LTE Cellular Networks Packet Scheduling Algorithms in Downlink and Uplink Transmission, A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.11369 v1 pith:FBLZXPQH submitted 2022-04-24 cs.NI

LTE Cellular Networks Packet Scheduling Algorithms in Downlink and Uplink Transmission, A Survey

classification cs.NI
keywords packetschedulinguplinkdownlinkalgorithmsfirstusedaccess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This survey paper provides a detailed explanation of Long Term Evolution cellular network packet scheduling algorithms in both downlink and uplink directions. It starts by explaining the difference between Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access that is used in downlink transmission, and Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access is used in uplink. Then, it explains the difference between the LTE scheduling process in the donwlink and uplink through explaining the interaction between users and the scheduler. Then, it explains the most commonly used downlink and uplink scheduling algorithms through analyzing their formulas, characteristics, most suitable conditions for them to work in, and the main differences among them. This explanation covers the Max Carrier-to-Interference, Round Robin, Proportional Fair, Earliest Deadline First, Modified EDF-PF, Modified-Largest Weighted Delay First, Exponential Proportional Fairness, Token Queues Mechanism, Packet Loss Ratio, Quality Guaranteed, Opportunistic Packet Loss Fair, Low Complexity, LC-Delay, PF-Delay, Maximum Throughput, First Maximum Expansion, and Adaptive Resource Allocation Based Packet Scheduling. Lastly, it provides some concluding remarks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.