Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Diffstar: A Fully Parametric Physical Model for Galaxy Assembly History

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.04273 v2 pith:7ED7VJ6D submitted 2022-05-09 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Diffstar: A Fully Parametric Physical Model for Galaxy Assembly History

classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords diffstarformationgalaxiesmodelstargalaxyhaloassembly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present Diffstar, a smooth parametric model for the in-situ star formation history (SFH) of galaxies. Diffstar is distinct from conventional SFH models that are used to interpret the spectral energy distribution (SED) of an observed galaxy, because our model is parametrized directly in terms of basic features of galaxy formation physics. The Diffstar model assumes that star formation is fueled by the accretion of gas into the dark matter halo of the galaxy, and at the foundation of Diffstar is a parametric model for halo mass assembly, Diffmah. We include parametrized ingredients for the fraction of accreted gas that is eventually transformed into stars, $\epsilon_{\rm ms},$ and for the timescale over which this transformation occurs, $\tau_{\rm cons};$ some galaxies in Diffstar experience a quenching event at time $t_{\rm q},$ and may subsequently experience rejuvenated star formation. We fit the SFHs of galaxies predicted by the IllustrisTNG (TNG) and UniverseMachine (UM) simulations with the Diffstar parameterization, and show that our model is sufficiently flexible to describe the average stellar mass histories of galaxies in both simulations with an accuracy of $\sim0.1$ dex across most of cosmic time. We use Diffstar to compare TNG to UM in common physical terms, finding that: (i) star formation in UM is less efficient and burstier relative to TNG; (ii) galaxies in UM have longer gas consumption timescales, $\tau_{\rm cons}$, relative to TNG; (iii) rejuvenated star formation is ubiquitous in UM, whereas quenched TNG galaxies rarely experience sustained rejuvenation; and (iv) in both simulations, the distributions of $\epsilon_{\rm ms}$, $\tau_{\rm cons}$, and $t_{\rm q}$ share a common characteristic dependence upon halo mass, and present significant correlations with halo assembly history. [Abridged]

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Forecasting neutrino mass constraints from the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Roman Space Telescope forecasts using Hα galaxy mocks yield m_ν < 0.276 eV (68% CL) with Planck priors via EFT of LSS, and m_ν < 0.36 eV via model-independent phenomenological analysis.