Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Referee Primer for Early Career Astronomers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.14270 v1 pith:T7YRYWH5 submitted 2022-05-27 astro-ph.IM

Michelle Ntampaka , Ana Bonaca , Sownak Bose , Daniel J. Eisenstein , Boryana Hadzhiyska , Charlotte Mason , Daisuke Nagai , Joshua S. Speagle This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords astronomerscareerearlyrefereerefereeingapproacharticleastronomical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Refereeing is a crucial component of publishing astronomical research, but few professional astronomers receive formal training on how to effectively referee a manuscript. In this article, we lay out considerations and best practices for referees. This document is intended as a tool for early career researchers to develop a fair, effective, and efficient approach to refereeing.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools