Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Calibrate and Debias Layer-wise Sampling for Graph Convolutional Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.00583 v2 pith:GFPTSHWW submitted 2022-06-01 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords samplinglayer-wisealgorithmapproachconvolutionalestimationexistinggraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multiple sampling-based methods have been developed for approximating and accelerating node embedding aggregation in graph convolutional networks (GCNs) training. Among them, a layer-wise approach recursively performs importance sampling to select neighbors jointly for existing nodes in each layer. This paper revisits the approach from a matrix approximation perspective, and identifies two issues in the existing layer-wise sampling methods: suboptimal sampling probabilities and estimation biases induced by sampling without replacement. To address these issues, we accordingly propose two remedies: a new principle for constructing sampling probabilities and an efficient debiasing algorithm. The improvements are demonstrated by extensive analyses of estimation variance and experiments on common benchmarks. Code and algorithm implementations are publicly available at https://github.com/ychen-stat-ml/GCN-layer-wise-sampling .

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DAFOS: Dynamic Adaptive Fanout Optimization Sampler

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    DAFOS trains GNNs faster by starting with small fanout, increasing it when loss plateaus, and prioritizing high-degree nodes, but its speedup claims are confounded by an unfair early stopping comparison.

Pith tools