Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Semantic-Discriminative Mixup for Generalizable Sensor-based Cross-domain Activity Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.06629 v1 pith:C56KH5WC submitted 2022-06-14 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords datamixupactivitydomainmodeltrainingbroughtcross-domain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

It is expensive and time-consuming to collect sufficient labeled data to build human activity recognition (HAR) models. Training on existing data often makes the model biased towards the distribution of the training data, thus the model might perform terribly on test data with different distributions. Although existing efforts on transfer learning and domain adaptation try to solve the above problem, they still need access to unlabeled data on the target domain, which may not be possible in real scenarios. Few works pay attention to training a model that can generalize well to unseen target domains for HAR. In this paper, we propose a novel method called Semantic-Discriminative Mixup (SDMix) for generalizable cross-domain HAR. Firstly, we introduce semantic-aware Mixup that considers the activity semantic ranges to overcome the semantic inconsistency brought by domain differences. Secondly, we introduce the large margin loss to enhance the discrimination of Mixup to prevent misclassification brought by noisy virtual labels. Comprehensive generalization experiments on five public datasets demonstrate that our SDMix substantially outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches with 6% average accuracy improvement on cross-person, cross-dataset, and cross-position HAR.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools