Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Attention-aware contrastive learning for predicting T cell receptor-antigen binding specificity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.11255 v1 pith:AJ5IWXSD submitted 2022-05-17 q-bio.QM cs.LG

classification q-bio.QMcs.LG
keywords bindingcellcontrastivespecificitylearningmodelacidsamino
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

It has been verified that only a small fraction of the neoantigens presented by MHC class I molecules on the cell surface can elicit T cells. The limitation can be attributed to the binding specificity of T cell receptor (TCR) to peptide-MHC complex (pMHC). Computational prediction of T cell binding to neoantigens is an challenging and unresolved task. In this paper, we propose an attentive-mask contrastive learning model, ATMTCR, for inferring TCR-antigen binding specificity. For each input TCR sequence, we used Transformer encoder to transform it to latent representation, and then masked a proportion of residues guided by attention weights to generate its contrastive view. Pretraining on large-scale TCR CDR3 sequences, we verified that contrastive learning significantly improved the prediction performance of TCR binding to peptide-MHC complex (pMHC). Beyond the detection of important amino acids and their locations in the TCR sequence, our model can also extracted high-order semantic information underlying the TCR-antigen binding specificity. Comparison experiments were conducted on two independent datasets, our method achieved better performance than other existing algorithms. Moreover, we effectively identified important amino acids and their positional preferences through attention weights, which indicated the interpretability of our proposed model.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools