Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Neutrino Mass Ordering -- Circumventing the Challenges using Synergy between T2HK and JUNO

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.04784 v2 pith:YAEUEQIT submitted 2022-07-11 hep-ph hep-ex

classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords junot2hkdeltaexperimentssynergyenergygreaterresolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

One of the major open problems of neutrino physics is MO (mass ordering). We discuss the prospects of measuring MO with two under-construction experiments T2HK and JUNO. JUNO alone is expected to measure MO with greater than $3\sigma$ significance as long as certain experimental challenges are met. In particular, JUNO needs better than 3$\%$ energy resolution for MO measurement. On the other hand, T2HK has rather poor prospects at measuring the MO, especially for certain ranges of the CP violating parameter $\delta_{\rm CP}$, posing a major drawback for T2HK. In this letter we show that the synergy between JUNO and T2HK will bring two-fold advantage. Firstly, the synergy between the two experiments helps us determine the MO at a very high significance. With the baseline set-up of the two experiments, we have a greater than $9\sigma$ determination of the MO for all values of $\delta_{\rm CP}$. Secondly, the synergy also allows us to relax the constraints on the two experiments. We show that JUNO, could perform extremely well even for energy resolution of 5$\%$, while for T2HK the MO problem with "bad" values of $\delta_{\rm CP}$ goes away. The MO sensitivity for the combined analysis is expected to be greater than $6\sigma$ for all values of $\delta_{\rm CP}$ and with just 5$\%$ energy resolution for JUNO.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools