Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Exploring the trade off between human driving imitation and safety for traffic simulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.04803 v1 pith:BGML7O5S submitted 2022-08-09 cs.LG cs.RO

classification cs.LGcs.RO
keywords drivinglearningtraffichumanpoliciessafetyhighlyimitation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Traffic simulation has gained a lot of interest for quantitative evaluation of self driving vehicles performance. In order for a simulator to be a valuable test bench, it is required that the driving policy animating each traffic agent in the scene acts as humans would do while maintaining minimal safety guarantees. Learning the driving policies of traffic agents from recorded human driving data or through reinforcement learning seems to be an attractive solution for the generation of realistic and highly interactive traffic situations in uncontrolled intersections or roundabouts. In this work, we show that a trade-off exists between imitating human driving and maintaining safety when learning driving policies. We do this by comparing how various Imitation learning and Reinforcement learning algorithms perform when applied to the driving task. We also propose a multi objective learning algorithm (MOPPO) that improves both objectives together. We test our driving policies on highly interactive driving scenarios extracted from INTERACTION Dataset to evaluate how human-like they behave.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools