Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A large dataset of software mentions in the biomedical literature

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.00693 v4 pith:GVJFYLL3 submitted 2022-09-01 cs.DL q-bio.OT

A large dataset of software mentions in the biomedical literature

classification cs.DL q-bio.OT
keywords softwarementionsdatasetuniquemillioncollectionentitiesextracted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We describe the CZ Software Mentions dataset, a new dataset of software mentions in biomedical papers. Plain-text software mentions are extracted with a trained SciBERT model from several sources: the NIH PubMed Central collection and from papers provided by various publishers to the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. The dataset provides sources, context and metadata, and, for a number of mentions, the disambiguated software entities and links. We extract 1.12 million unique string software mentions from 2.4 million papers in the NIH PMC-OA Commercial subset, 481k unique mentions from the NIH PMC-OA Non-Commercial subset (both gathered in October 2021) and 934k unique mentions from 3 million papers in the Publishers' collection. There is variation in how software is mentioned in papers and extracted by the NER algorithm. We propose a clustering-based disambiguation algorithm to map plain-text software mentions into distinct software entities and apply it on the NIH PubMed Central Commercial collection. Through this methodology, we disambiguate 1.12 million unique strings extracted by the NER model into 97600 unique software entities, covering 78% of all software-paper links. We link 185000 of the mentions to a repository, covering about 55% of all software-paper links. We describe in detail the process of building the datasets, disambiguating and linking the software mentions, as well as opportunities and challenges that come with a dataset of this size. We make all data and code publicly available as a new resource to help assess the impact of software (in particular scientific open source projects) on science.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Reciprocal Impact of Science and Software: A Cross-Corpus Analysis of How Research Shapes Software and Software Enables Research

    cs.DL 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    Science and software impact each other through complementary strata, but sparse paper–repo linkage makes reuse–citation coupling gap-sensitive and prevents strong decoupling claims.

  2. The software space of science

    cs.DL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A network analysis of software mentions in 1.3 million papers identifies 520 tools in eight communities and shows disciplines maintain distinct, stable tool portfolios that are crystallizing toward common sets.

  3. The Reciprocal Impact of Science and Software: A Cross-Corpus Analysis of How Research Shapes Software and Software Enables Research

    cs.DL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A 69.8M-edge cross-corpus graph shows science influencing software mainly via reproducibility and sequence tools while software influences science via ML infrastructure, but direct links are sparse and reuse-citation ...

  4. Biomedical Open Source Software: Crucial Packages and Hidden Heroes

    cs.SE 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Network analysis of software mentions in biomedical papers identifies high-centrality foundational packages in three major open-source ecosystems.