Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Benchmarking Multimodal Variational Autoencoders: CdSprites+ Dataset and Toolkit

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.03048 v3 pith:Q7RZRNDC submitted 2022-09-07 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords multimodaldatasetbeenmodelstoolkitautoencoderscommonlycomparison
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) have been the subject of intense research in the past years as they can integrate multiple modalities into a joint representation and can thus serve as a promising tool for both data classification and generation. Several approaches toward multimodal VAE learning have been proposed so far, their comparison and evaluation have however been rather inconsistent. One reason is that the models differ at the implementation level, another problem is that the datasets commonly used in these cases were not initially designed to evaluate multimodal generative models. This paper addresses both mentioned issues. First, we propose a toolkit for systematic multimodal VAE training and comparison. The toolkit currently comprises 4 existing multimodal VAEs and 6 commonly used benchmark datasets along with instructions on how to easily add a new model or a dataset. Second, we present a disentangled bimodal dataset designed to comprehensively evaluate the joint generation and cross-generation capabilities across multiple difficulty levels. We demonstrate the utility of our dataset by comparing the implemented state-of-the-art models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools