Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A MIP-Based Approach for Multi-Robot Geometric Task-and-Motion Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.08005 v1 pith:3Q6IGVMV submitted 2022-08-30 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords objectstask-and-motionrobotscollaborativeinformationperformplanningplans
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We address multi-robot geometric task-and-motion planning (MR-GTAMP) problems in synchronous, monotone setups. The goal of the MR-GTAMP problem is to move objects with multiple robots to goal regions in the presence of other movable objects. To perform the tasks successfully and effectively, the robots have to adopt intelligent collaboration strategies, i.e., decide which robot should move which objects to which positions, and perform collaborative actions, such as handovers. To endow robots with these collaboration capabilities, we propose to first collect occlusion and reachability information for each robot as well as information about whether two robots can perform a handover action by calling motion-planning algorithms. We then propose a method that uses the collected information to build a graph structure which captures the precedence of the manipulations of different objects and supports the implementation of a mixed-integer program to guide the search for highly effective collaborative task-and-motion plans. The search process for collaborative task-and-motion plans is based on a Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) exploration strategy to achieve exploration-exploitation balance. We evaluate our framework in two challenging GTAMP domains and show that it can generate high-quality task-and-motion plans with respect to the planning time, the resulting plan length and the number of objects moved compared to two state-of-the-art baselines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools