Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Modelling Control Arguments via Cooperation Logic in Unforeseen Scenarios

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.12114 v1 pith:XXL76CMD submitted 2022-10-21 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords accountagentsargumentationargumentscontrolcooperationenvironmentlogic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The intent of control argumentation frameworks is to specifically model strategic scenarios from the perspective of an agent by extending the standard model of argumentation framework in a way that takes unquantified uncertainty regarding arguments and attacks into account. They do not, however, adequately account for coalition formation and interactions among a set of agents in an uncertain environment. To address this challenge, we propose a formalism of a multi-agent scenario via cooperation logic and investigate agents' strategies and actions in a dynamic environment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools