Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Are Deep Sequence Classifiers Good at Non-Trivial Generalization?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.13082 v2 pith:ND7DNKW6 submitted 2022-10-24 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords classificationlearningmodelssequenceclassdeepdistributiongeneralization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in deep learning models for sequence classification have greatly improved their classification accuracy, specially when large training sets are available. However, several works have suggested that under some settings the predictions made by these models are poorly calibrated. In this work we study binary sequence classification problems and we look at model calibration from a different perspective by asking the question: Are deep learning models capable of learning the underlying target class distribution? We focus on sparse sequence classification, that is problems in which the target class is rare and compare three deep learning sequence classification models. We develop an evaluation that measures how well a classifier is learning the target class distribution. In addition, our evaluation disentangles good performance achieved by mere compression of the training sequences versus performance achieved by proper model generalization. Our results suggest that in this binary setting the deep-learning models are indeed able to learn the underlying class distribution in a non-trivial manner, i.e. by proper generalization beyond data compression.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools