pith. sign in

arxiv: 2211.12961 · v1 · pith:BMNIJCISnew · submitted 2022-11-22 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Response to "Parton distributions need representative sampling"

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords nnpdf4pdfssamplingaboveabsolutebeencentralclaimed
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We respond to the criticism raised by Courtoy et al., in which the faithfulness of the NNPDF4.0 sampling is questioned and an under-estimate of the NNPDF4.0 PDF uncertainties is implied. We list, correct, and clarify in detail a number of inaccurate or misleading claims that are made in this Reference. Specifically, we explain and explicitly demonstrate why the central value of the PDF distribution does not generally coincide with the absolute minimum of the $\chi^{2}$ to the data. We examine some PDFs that have been constructed in the above study and claimed to be "good solutions": we show that similar PDFs are found with the NNPDF methodology, but with very low probability.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Les Houches 2023 -- Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision Wishlist

    hep-ph 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The report reviews progress since 2021 in fixed-order computations for LHC applications and identifies processes requiring missing higher-order corrections to match anticipated experimental precision.