Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Efficient Evaluation Methods for Neural Architecture Search: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.05919 v2 pith:P2HDP626 submitted 2023-01-14 cs.NE

Efficient Evaluation Methods for Neural Architecture Search: A Survey

classification cs.NE
keywords eemsevaluationneuralresearchsurveyarchitecturedesigndirections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has received increasing attention because of its exceptional merits in automating the design of Deep Neural Network (DNN) architectures. However, the performance evaluation process, as a key part of NAS, often requires training a large number of DNNs. This inevitably makes NAS computationally expensive. In past years, many Efficient Evaluation Methods (EEMs) have been proposed to address this critical issue. In this paper, we comprehensively survey these EEMs published up to date, and provide a detailed analysis to motivate the further development of this research direction. Specifically, we divide the existing EEMs into four categories based on the number of DNNs trained for constructing these EEMs. The categorization can reflect the degree of efficiency in principle, which can in turn help quickly grasp the methodological features. In surveying each category, we further discuss the design principles and analyze the strengths and weaknesses to clarify the landscape of existing EEMs, thus making easily understanding the research trends of EEMs. Furthermore, we also discuss the current challenges and issues to identify future research directions in this emerging topic. In summary, this survey provides a convenient overview of EEM for interested users, and they can easily select the proper EEM method for the tasks at hand. In addition, the researchers in the NAS field could continue exploring the future directions suggested in the paper.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. No Training, Better Flights: Test-Time Scaled VLMs for UAV Navigation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Test-time scaling—parallel candidate generation, iterative self-correction, and multi-criteria selection—improves a frozen UAV navigation VLM's success rate by about 2 percentage points on the TravelUAV benchmark.