Pith. sign in

REVIEW

DeepCAM: A Fully CAM-based Inference Accelerator with Variable Hash Lengths for Energy-efficient Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.04712 v1 pith:KOP7VEBK submitted 2023-02-09 cs.LG cs.ET

classification cs.LGcs.ET
keywords computationdeepcamacceleratorbuiltdeepdot-productnetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

With ever increasing depth and width in deep neural networks to achieve state-of-the-art performance, deep learning computation has significantly grown, and dot-products remain dominant in overall computation time. Most prior works are built on conventional dot-product where weighted input summation is used to represent the neuron operation. However, another implementation of dot-product based on the notion of angles and magnitudes in the Euclidean space has attracted limited attention. This paper proposes DeepCAM, an inference accelerator built on two critical innovations to alleviate the computation time bottleneck of convolutional neural networks. The first innovation is an approximate dot-product built on computations in the Euclidean space that can replace addition and multiplication with simple bit-wise operations. The second innovation is a dynamic size content addressable memory-based (CAM-based) accelerator to perform bit-wise operations and accelerate the CNNs with a lower computation time. Our experiments on benchmark image recognition datasets demonstrate that DeepCAM is up to 523x and 3498x faster than Eyeriss and traditional CPUs like Intel Skylake, respectively. Furthermore, the energy consumed by our DeepCAM approach is 2.16x to 109x less compared to Eyeriss.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools