Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Remote Identification Trajectory Coverage in Urban Air Mobility Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.09653 v1 pith:3M43ZTKB submitted 2023-02-19 eess.SY cs.SY

Remote Identification Trajectory Coverage in Urban Air Mobility Applications

classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords remotecoveragetrajectorymobilityneededreceiversurbanachieve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As Urban Air Mobility (UAM) and Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) continue to mature, a safety-critical system that will need to be implemented in tandem is Remote Identification (Remote ID) for uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS). To ensure successful and efficient deployment (e.g., maximal surveillance of UAS trajectories), as well as to better understand secondary impacts (e.g., consumer privacy risks in collecting real-time UAS trajectory information), the coverage of broadcast-receive Remote ID architectures needs to be characterized. Motivated by this need, we examine theoretical and empirical trajectory coverage of several common Remote ID technologies (e.g., Bluetooth, Wi-Fi) deployed for urban package delivery missions, a commonly-cited use case for UAM and AAM. We derive methods to explicitly compute expected coverage proportions under idealized geometries, as well as conduct case studies with realistic city geographies and UAS path planning algorithms. An example of results include approximate magnitudes of Remote ID receivers needed (approximately 500-5000 receivers needed to achieve 50-95\% coverage for Bluetooth Legacy, and approximately 10-40 receivers needed for the same coverage range for Wi-Fi NAN/Beacon, assuming a cruise altitude of 200 feet) to achieve specific trajectory coverage proportions for San Francisco, California. Our analyses, combined with complementary works related to Remote ID bandwidth and deployment topologies, can help guide municipal authorities and AAM stakeholders in future Remote ID system deployments and upkeep.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.