Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Flexible nuclear power and fluctuating renewables? -- A techno-economic analysis for decarbonized energy systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.14515 v3 pith:LRJG4H37 submitted 2023-02-28 eess.SY cs.SY

Flexible nuclear power and fluctuating renewables? -- A techno-economic analysis for decarbonized energy systems

classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords nuclearcostsenergypowerconstructionsystemsanalysisfluctuating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many governments are considering constructing new nuclear power plants to support the decarbonization of the energy system. On the one hand, dispatchable nuclear plants can complement fluctuating generation from wind and PV. On the other hand, escalating construction costs and times raise economic concerns. In this paper, we extensively review construction costs and times. On this basis, we apply a detailed multi-vector energy model to analyze the cost-efficient share of nuclear power in fully decarbonized energy systems, i.e., energy systems that do not utilize any fossil fuels. Our analysis finds that even if, reversing the historical trend, overnight construction costs of nuclear half to 4,000 US-$2018 per kW and construction times remain below ten years, the cost-efficient share of nuclear power in European electricity generation is only around 10%. The analysis still omits the social costs of nuclear power, such as the risk of accidents or waste management. Nuclear plants must operate inflexibly and at capacity factors close to 90% to recover their investment costs, implying that operational flexibility-even if technically possible-is not economically viable. As a result, grid infrastructure, flexible demand in multi-energy systems, and storage are more efficient options for integrating fluctuating wind and photovoltaic generation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.