pith. sign in

arxiv: 2303.00208 · v2 · pith:M3XFGIRQnew · submitted 2023-03-01 · 💻 cs.GT · econ.TH· q-fin.MF· q-fin.TR

A Myersonian Framework for Optimal Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers

classification 💻 cs.GT econ.THq-fin.MFq-fin.TR
keywords assetoptimalpriceestimatetraderammsautomatedcharacterize
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In decentralized finance ("DeFi"), automated market makers (AMMs) enable traders to programmatically exchange one asset for another. Such trades are enabled by the assets deposited by liquidity providers (LPs). The goal of this paper is to characterize and interpret the optimal (i.e., profit-maximizing) strategy of a monopolist liquidity provider, as a function of that LP's beliefs about asset prices and trader behavior. We introduce a general framework for reasoning about AMMs based on a Bayesian-like belief inference framework, where LPs maintain an asset price estimate. In this model, the market maker (i.e., LP) chooses a demand curve that specifies the quantity of a risky asset to be held at each dollar price. Traders arrive sequentially and submit a price bid that can be interpreted as their estimate of the risky asset price; the AMM responds to this submitted bid with an allocation of the risky asset to the trader, a payment that the trader must pay, and a revised internal estimate for the true asset price. We define an incentive-compatible (IC) AMM as one in which a trader's optimal strategy is to submit its true estimate of the asset price, and characterize the IC AMMs as those with downward-sloping demand curves and payments defined by a formula familiar from Myerson's optimal auction theory. We generalize Myerson's virtual values, and characterize the profit-maximizing IC AMM. The optimal demand curve generally has a jump that can be interpreted as a "bid-ask spread," which we show is caused by a combination of adverse selection risk (dominant when the degree of information asymmetry is large) and monopoly pricing (dominant when asymmetry is small). This work opens up new research directions into the study of automated exchange mechanisms from the lens of optimal auction theory and iterative belief inference, using tools of theoretical computer science in a novel way.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Privacy Subsidy: Kyle's $\lambda$ under Noise-Perturbed Order-Flow Observation

    cs.GT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives closed-form rescaling of Kyle lambda and informed strategy under Gaussian order-flow noise, with invariant product and explicit privacy subsidy from liquidity providers to traders.

  2. The Privacy Subsidy: Kyle's $\lambda$ under Noise-Perturbed Order-Flow Observation

    cs.GT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives closed-form linear Kyle equilibrium under Gaussian privacy noise on order flow observation, with rescaled price-impact coefficient and informed-trader strategy but invariant product, plus welfare decomposition...

  3. The Privacy Subsidy: Kyle's $\lambda$ under Noise-Perturbed Order-Flow Observation

    cs.GT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives closed-form Kyle equilibrium under Gaussian privacy noise on order flow, with invariant price-impact product and a privacy subsidy as the break-even fee for privacy-aggregated exchanges.