Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Buzzard to Cardinal: Improved Mock Catalogs for Large Galaxy Surveys

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.12104 v1 pith:Y2XYSK3W submitted 2023-03-21 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

Buzzard to Cardinal: Improved Mock Catalogs for Large Galaxy Surveys

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords cardinalgalaxymocksmodelbuzzardcatalogsgalaxiesluminosity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the Cardinal mock galaxy catalogs, a new version of the Buzzard simulation that has been updated to support ongoing and future cosmological surveys, including DES, DESI, and LSST. These catalogs are based on a one-quarter sky simulation populated with galaxies out to a redshift of $z=2.35$ to a depth of $m_{\rm{r}}=27$. Compared to the Buzzard mocks, the Cardinal mocks include an updated subhalo abundance matching (SHAM) model that considers orphan galaxies and includes mass-dependent scatter between galaxy luminosity and halo properties. This model can simultaneously fit galaxy clustering and group--galaxy cross-correlations measured in three different luminosity threshold samples. The Cardinal mocks also feature a new color assignment model that can simultaneously fit color-dependent galaxy clustering in three different luminosity bins. We have developed an algorithm that uses photometric data to improve the color assignment model further and have also developed a novel method to improve small-scale lensing below the ray-tracing resolution. These improvements enable the Cardinal mocks to accurately reproduce the abundance of galaxy clusters and the properties of lens galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey data. As such, these simulations will be a valuable tool for future cosmological analyses based on large sky surveys. The cardinal mock will be released upon publication at https://chunhaoto.com/cardinalsim.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Primordial Physics in the Nonlinear Universe: Revealing the oscillating halo bias from cosmological collider models

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    A binning-based IC method yields the first N-body measurements of oscillating halo bias from cosmological collider bispectra, with mass- and assembly-dependent phases fit by peak-background-split theory.

  2. Where Galaxies Point: First Measurement of the Large-Scale Axial Intrinsic Alignment

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 reject novelty 7.0

    DES galaxy position angles show a coherent preferred axis (RA≈300°, Dec≈50°) — elliptical major and spiral minor axes aligned along it — reported as the first detection of horizon-scale axial intrinsic alignment.

  3. Impact of projection-induced optical selection bias on the weak lensing mass calibration of galaxy clusters

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Projection-induced selection bias causes 20-50% overestimation of weak lensing masses for optically selected galaxy clusters, larger on scales >3 Mpc.

  4. Modeling Redshift Uncertainties in Roman Weak Lensing Cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0

    A PCA-based redshift uncertainty model, implemented for Roman in CoCoA, matches or outperforms the nine-bin mean-shift model at mitigating S8 and Omega_m biases in simulated cosmic shear analyses.