Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Neutrinoless double beta decay: neutrino mass versus new physics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.17261 v2 pith:NWJEMS3X submitted 2023-03-30 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords neutrinophysicsmassbetadecaydoubleneutrinolessunification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neutrinoless double beta decay is the textbook example of lepton number violation, often claimed to be a probe of neutrino Majorana mass. However, it could be triggered by new physics; after all, neutrino Majorana mass requires physics beyond the Standard Model. If at least one electron were right-handed, it would automatically signify new physics rather than neutrino mass. In case both electrons were left-handed, the situation would become rather complicated, and additional effort would be needed to untangle the source for this process. We offer a comprehensive study of this issue from both the effective operator approach and the possible UV completions, including the Pati-Salam quark-lepton unification. While neutrino exchange is natural and physically preferred, our findings show that new physics can still be responsible for the neutrinoless double beta decay. In particular, the Pati-Salam theory can do the job, consistently with all the phenomenological and unification constraints, as long as the unification scale lies above 10^12 GeV, albeit at the price of fine-tuning of some scalar masses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools