Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.03111 v3 pith:FLOCTKMF submitted 2023-05-04 cs.CL

Jinyang Li , Binyuan Hui , Ge Qu , Jiaxi Yang , Binhua Li , Bowen Li , Bailin Wang , Bowen Qin
show 10 more authors
Rongyu Cao Ruiying Geng Nan Huo Xuanhe Zhou Chenhao Ma Guoliang Li Kevin C.C. Chang Fei Huang Reynold Cheng Yongbin Li
This is my paper
classification cs.CL
keywords databasetext-to-sqlcontentsdatabasesapplicationsbirdchallengeschatgpt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text-to-SQL parsing, which aims at converting natural language instructions into executable SQLs, has gained increasing attention in recent years. In particular, Codex and ChatGPT have shown impressive results in this task. However, most of the prevalent benchmarks, i.e., Spider, and WikiSQL, focus on database schema with few rows of database contents leaving the gap between academic study and real-world applications. To mitigate this gap, we present Bird, a big benchmark for large-scale database grounded in text-to-SQL tasks, containing 12,751 pairs of text-to-SQL data and 95 databases with a total size of 33.4 GB, spanning 37 professional domains. Our emphasis on database values highlights the new challenges of dirty database contents, external knowledge between NL questions and database contents, and SQL efficiency, particularly in the context of massive databases. To solve these problems, text-to-SQL models must feature database value comprehension in addition to semantic parsing. The experimental results demonstrate the significance of database values in generating accurate text-to-SQLs for big databases. Furthermore, even the most effective text-to-SQL models, i.e. ChatGPT, only achieves 40.08% in execution accuracy, which is still far from the human result of 92.96%, proving that challenges still stand. Besides, we also provide an efficiency analysis to offer insights into generating text-to-efficient-SQLs that are beneficial to industries. We believe that BIRD will contribute to advancing real-world applications of text-to-SQL research. The leaderboard and source code are available: https://bird-bench.github.io/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DataClawEval: A Benchmark for Data Engineering Agents in Real Industrial Harness

    cs.AI 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A production-grounded, sandbox-graded benchmark of 100 multi-engine data-engineering tasks shows frontier agents top out at 74.9 with no cross-engine winner.

  2. Text-to-SQL Oriented to the Process Mining Domain: A PT-EN Dataset for Query Translation

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    text-2-SQL-4-PM is a bilingual benchmark with 1,655 human utterances and 205 gold SQL statements for text-to-SQL in process mining.

  3. Agentic Data Environments

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes Agentic Data Environments that amplify agent capabilities (via information management, retrieval, and elicitation) while bounding failure consequences (via branching and data flow control).

  4. Spider 2.0-AIFunc: Extending Real-World Text-to-SQL to AI-Native SQL Workflows

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spider 2.0-AIFunc is a 465-instance benchmark for evaluating text-to-SQL systems on queries that incorporate Snowflake Cortex AI functions, with evaluations of ten models showing proprietary models reach 67-70% accuracy.

  5. Memory Reward Inflation in Self-Improving LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Self-graded memory in LLM agents systematically overvalues wrong episodes, compounding through reuse, and can be corrected by a de-correlated, answer-free signal.

  6. Rethinking Query Optimization for Multi-Agent Systems [Vision]

    cs.DB 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Agentic data pipelines are built by hand today; this paper sets a research agenda for automatically optimizing their structure, model choices, and execution engines jointly as a new query-optimization problem.

  7. RASL: Retrieval Augmented Schema Linking for Massive Database Text-to-SQL

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RASL retrieves relevant tables and columns for text-to-SQL by decomposing schemas into semantic entities, calibrating entity-type importance on training data, and using an LLM to rank candidates, beating baselines on ...

  8. Text-to-SQL for Enterprise Data Analytics

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An enterprise Text-to-SQL chatbot augmented with a knowledge graph, context ranking, and query-fixing agents achieves 53% correct or nearly correct answers on LinkedIn's internal benchmark, with knowledge graph compon...

  9. CRAFT: Learn the Schema, Execute the Plan

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CRAFT, a two-stage post-training recipe that strips schema documentation from prompts and uses execution-grounded reinforcement learning, reports improved enterprise coding-agent quality at roughly 9x lower input-token cost.

  10. Confidence Estimation for Text-to-SQL in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Consistency-based methods are the most reliable confidence signal for text-to-SQL in black-box LLMs, and executing queries against a database adds a useful correctness signal.

Pith tools