Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the Benefits of Semi-Supervised Test Case Generation for Simulation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.03714 v2 pith:NNPQIZYK submitted 2023-05-05 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords simulationgenclumethodsmodelssemi-supervisedfully-supervisedgenerationlabeled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Testing complex simulation models can be expensive and time consuming. Current state-of-the-art methods that explore this problem are fully-supervised; i.e. they require that all examples are labeled. On the other hand, the GenClu system (introduced in this paper) takes a semi-supervised approach; i.e. (a) only a small subset of information is actually labeled (via simulation) and (b) those labels are then spread across the rest of the data. When applied to five open-source simulation models of cyber-physical systems, GenClu's test generation can be multiple orders of magnitude faster than the prior state of the art. Further, when assessed via mutation testing, tests generated by GenClu were as good or better than anything else tested here. Hence, we recommend semi-supervised methods over prior methods (evolutionary search and fully-supervised learning).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools