Distributional Multi-Objective Decision Making
read the original abstract
For effective decision support in scenarios with conflicting objectives, sets of potentially optimal solutions can be presented to the decision maker. We explore both what policies these sets should contain and how such sets can be computed efficiently. With this in mind, we take a distributional approach and introduce a novel dominance criterion relating return distributions of policies directly. Based on this criterion, we present the distributional undominated set and show that it contains optimal policies otherwise ignored by the Pareto front. In addition, we propose the convex distributional undominated set and prove that it comprises all policies that maximise expected utility for multivariate risk-averse decision makers. We propose a novel algorithm to learn the distributional undominated set and further contribute pruning operators to reduce the set to the convex distributional undominated set. Through experiments, we demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of these methods, making this a valuable new approach for decision support in real-world problems.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Issues with Value-Based Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning: Value Function Interference and Overestimation Sensitivity
Reports value function interference and overestimation sensitivity as issues hindering value-based MORL with non-linear scalarisation, shown via tabular Q-learning on simple multi-objective MDPs.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.