Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy magnification bias. I. Cosmological analysis with a single redshift bin

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.13835 v2 pith:MDX6U6TT submitted 2023-05-23 astro-ph.CO

Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy magnification bias. I. Cosmological analysis with a single redshift bin

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords analysiscosmologicalsamplesigmabetabiasdistributionforeground
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

The main goal of this work, the second in a three-paper series, is to test the impact of a methodological improvement in measuring the magnification bias signal on a sample of submillimeter galaxies and its implications for constraining cosmological parameters. The analysis considers the angular cross-correlation function between a foreground sample of GAMA galaxies ($0.2<z<0.8$) and a background sample of H-ATLAS submillimeter galaxies ($1.2<z<4.0$). A refined methodology, discussed extensively in Paper I, is used. By interpreting the weak lensing signal within the halo model and employing an MCMC algorithm, the posterior distribution of the halo occupation distribution (HOD) and cosmological parameters is obtained for a flat $\Lambda$CDM model. The analysis incorporates the foreground angular auto-correlation function to account for galaxy clustering. The results demonstrate a remarkable improvement in uncertainties for both HOD and cosmological parameters compared to previous studies. However, when using the cross-correlation data alone, the estimation of $\sigma_8$ depends on prior knowledge of $\beta$, the logarithmic slope of the background number counts. Assuming a physically motivated prior distribution for $\beta$, mean values of $\Omega_m=0.18^{+0.03}{-0.03}$ and $\sigma_8=1.04^{+0.11}{-0.07}$ are obtained. These results may however be subject to an inherent bias in the data due to anomalous behavior observed in the G15 field. After excluding the G15 region, the mean values shift to $\Omega_m=0.30^{+0.05}{-0.06}$ and $\sigma_8=0.92^{+0.07}{-0.07}$. This becomes more apparent when adding the clustering of the foreground sample, but the dependence on $\beta$ information disappears, mitigating the aforementioned issue. Excluding the G15 region, the joint analysis yields mean values of $\Omega_m=0.36^{+0.03}{-0.07}$, $\sigma_8=0.90^{+0.03}{-0.03}$, and $h=0.76^{+0.14}_{-0.14}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Methodological refinement of the submillimeter galaxy cross-correlation function measurements and their uncertainty estimation

    astro-ph.CO 2023-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A new methodology counts galaxy pairs over entire fields and uses k-means patches plus oversampled bootstrap covariance to produce more robust cross-correlation measurements for magnification bias studies in GAMA fields.