Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Online Causation Monitoring of Signal Temporal Logic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.17754 v1 pith:2FWHDIOI submitted 2023-05-28 eess.SY cs.FLcs.LOcs.SY

Online Causation Monitoring of Signal Temporal Logic

classification eess.SY cs.FLcs.LOcs.SY
keywords monitoringcausationinstantclassicmonitormonitorsonlinerobustness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Online monitoring is an effective validation approach for hybrid systems, that, at runtime, checks whether the (partial) signals of a system satisfy a specification in, e.g., Signal Temporal Logic (STL). The classic STL monitoring is performed by computing a robustness interval that specifies, at each instant, how far the monitored signals are from violating and satisfying the specification. However, since a robustness interval monotonically shrinks during monitoring, classic online monitors may fail in reporting new violations or in precisely describing the system evolution at the current instant. In this paper, we tackle these issues by considering the causation of violation or satisfaction, instead of directly using the robustness. We first introduce a Boolean causation monitor that decides whether each instant is relevant to the violation or satisfaction of the specification. We then extend this monitor to a quantitative causation monitor that tells how far an instant is from being relevant to the violation or satisfaction. We further show that classic monitors can be derived from our proposed ones. Experimental results show that the two proposed monitors are able to provide more detailed information about system evolution, without requiring a significantly higher monitoring cost.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.