Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Predicting Preferred Dialogue-to-Background Loudness Difference in Dialogue-Separated Audio

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.19100 v2 pith:2OW77YXP submitted 2023-05-30 eess.AS cs.SD

Predicting Preferred Dialogue-to-Background Loudness Difference in Dialogue-Separated Audio

classification eess.AS cs.SD
keywords pldsstemsaudiodialoguealternativebackgroundbaselinebroadcast
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dialogue Enhancement (DE) enables the rebalancing of dialogue and background sounds to fit personal preferences and needs in the context of broadcast audio. When individual audio stems are unavailable from production, Dialogue Separation (DS) can be applied to the final audio mixture to obtain estimates of these stems. This work focuses on Preferred Loudness Differences (PLDs) between dialogue and background sounds. While previous studies determined the PLD through a listening test employing original stems from production, stems estimated by DS are used in the present study. In addition, a larger variety of signal classes is considered. PLDs vary substantially across individuals (average interquartile range: 5.7 LU). Despite this variability, PLDs are found to be highly dependent on the signal type under consideration, and it is shown that median PLDs can be predicted using objective intelligibility metrics. Two existing baseline prediction methods - intended for use with original stems - displayed a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 7.5 LU and 5 LU, respectively. A modified baseline (MAE: 3.2 LU) and an alternative approach (MAE: 2.5 LU) are proposed. Results support the viability of processing final broadcast mixtures with DS and offering an alternative remixing that accounts for median PLDs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.