Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

dotears: Scalable, consistent DAG estimation using observational and interventional data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.19215 v2 pith:IB4C6MLO submitted 2023-05-30 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords dotearsstructuredatatextttdagserrorestimationmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

New biological assays like Perturb-seq link highly parallel CRISPR interventions to a high-dimensional transcriptomic readout, providing insight into gene regulatory networks. Causal gene regulatory networks can be represented by directed acyclic graph (DAGs), but learning DAGs from observational data is complicated by lack of identifiability and a combinatorial solution space. Score-based structure learning improves practical scalability of inferring DAGs. Previous score-based methods are sensitive to error variance structure; on the other hand, estimation of error variance is difficult without prior knowledge of structure. Accordingly, we present $\texttt{dotears}$ [doo-tairs], a continuous optimization framework which leverages observational and interventional data to infer a single causal structure, assuming a linear Structural Equation Model (SEM). $\texttt{dotears}$ exploits structural consequences of hard interventions to give a marginal estimate of exogenous error structure, bypassing the circular estimation problem. We show that $\texttt{dotears}$ is a provably consistent estimator of the true DAG under mild assumptions. $\texttt{dotears}$ outperforms other methods in varied simulations, and in real data infers edges that validate with higher precision and recall than state-of-the-art methods through differential expression tests and high-confidence protein-protein interactions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Landscape of Causal Discovery Data: Grounding Causal Discovery in Real-World Applications

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review showing causal discovery evaluation is still dominated by small, low-diversity datasets and structural metrics, with a curated set of realistic alternatives.

Pith tools