Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Blocked Cross-Validation: A Precise and Efficient Method for Hyperparameter Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.06591 v2 pith:2HGKA5EA submitted 2023-06-11 cs.LG stat.ME

classification cs.LGstat.ME
keywords hyperparametertuningblockedcross-validationerrorpreciseachievingadopted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Hyperparameter tuning plays a crucial role in optimizing the performance of predictive learners. Cross--validation (CV) is a widely adopted technique for estimating the error of different hyperparameter settings. Repeated cross-validation (RCV) has been commonly employed to reduce the variability of CV errors. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach called blocked cross-validation (BCV), where the repetitions are blocked with respect to both CV partition and the random behavior of the learner. Theoretical analysis and empirical experiments demonstrate that BCV provides more precise error estimates compared to RCV, even with a significantly reduced number of runs. We present extensive examples using real--world data sets to showcase the effectiveness and efficiency of BCV in hyperparameter tuning. Our results indicate that BCV outperforms RCV in hyperparameter tuning, achieving greater precision with fewer computations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools