Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FedSampling: A Better Sampling Strategy for Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.14245 v1 pith:HRIDKSBD submitted 2023-06-25 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learningdatafederatedclientssizeclientsamplefedsampling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated learning (FL) is an important technique for learning models from decentralized data in a privacy-preserving way. Existing FL methods usually uniformly sample clients for local model learning in each round. However, different clients may have significantly different data sizes, and the clients with more data cannot have more opportunities to contribute to model training, which may lead to inferior performance. In this paper, instead of client uniform sampling, we propose a novel data uniform sampling strategy for federated learning (FedSampling), which can effectively improve the performance of federated learning especially when client data size distribution is highly imbalanced across clients. In each federated learning round, local data on each client is randomly sampled for local model learning according to a probability based on the server desired sample size and the total sample size on all available clients. Since the data size on each client is privacy-sensitive, we propose a privacy-preserving way to estimate the total sample size with a differential privacy guarantee. Experiments on four benchmark datasets show that FedSampling can effectively improve the performance of federated learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FedSTaS: Client Stratification and Client Level Sampling for Efficient Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FedSTaS merges FedSTS-style stratified client sampling with FedSampling-style private data-level sampling and reports accuracy gains over FedSTS on MNIST and CIFAR-100 under non-IID splits.

Pith tools