Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Examining the Effects of Degree Distribution and Homophily in Graph Learning Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.08881 v1 pith:FDI4VXYW submitted 2023-07-17 cs.SI cs.LG

classification cs.SIcs.LG
keywords graphgraphworldbenchmarkinggeneratorsgraphsmodelmodelsdegree
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite a surge in interest in GNN development, homogeneity in benchmarking datasets still presents a fundamental issue to GNN research. GraphWorld is a recent solution which uses the Stochastic Block Model (SBM) to generate diverse populations of synthetic graphs for benchmarking any GNN task. Despite its success, the SBM imposed fundamental limitations on the kinds of graph structure GraphWorld could create. In this work we examine how two additional synthetic graph generators can improve GraphWorld's evaluation; LFR, a well-established model in the graph clustering literature and CABAM, a recent adaptation of the Barabasi-Albert model tailored for GNN benchmarking. By integrating these generators, we significantly expand the coverage of graph space within the GraphWorld framework while preserving key graph properties observed in real-world networks. To demonstrate their effectiveness, we generate 300,000 graphs to benchmark 11 GNN models on a node classification task. We find GNN performance variations in response to homophily, degree distribution and feature signal. Based on these findings, we classify models by their sensitivity to the new generators under these properties. Additionally, we release the extensions made to GraphWorld on the GitHub repository, offering further evaluation of GNN performance on new graphs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools