REVIEW 1 cited by
Slow graph bootstrap percolation I: Cycles
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Slow graph bootstrap percolation I: Cycles
read the original abstract
Given a fixed graph $H$ and an $n$-vertex graph $G$, the $H$\emph{-bootstrap percolation process} on $G$ is defined to be the sequence of graphs $G_i$, $i\geq 0$ which starts with $G_0 := G$ and in which $G_{i+1}$ is obtained from $G_i$ by adding every edge that completes a copy of $H$. We are interested in $M_H(n)$ which is the maximum number of steps, over all $n$-vertex graphs $G$, that this process takes to stabilise. We determine this maximum running time precisely when $H$ is a cycle, giving the first infinite family of graphs $H$ for which an exact solution is known. We find that $M_{C_k}(n)$ is of order $\log_{k-1}(n)$ for all $3\leq k\in \mathbb{N}$. Interestingly though, the function exhibits different behaviour depending on the parity of $k$ and the exact location of the values of $n$ for which $M_H(n)$ increases is determined by the Frobenius number of a certain numerical semigroup depending on $k$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bootstrap percolation of extension hypergraphs
For any graph G on t vertices and k at least 3, the maximum running time of the F-process where F is the k-extension of G is bounded by a constant C_{k,t} independent of n.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.