The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2308.12908 · v1 · pith:4VTTZQ74 · submitted 2023-08-24 · cs.DC · cs.AR· cs.LG

POLCA: Power Oversubscription in LLM Cloud Providers

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:4VTTZQ74record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.DC cs.ARcs.LG
keywords poweroversubscriptionclustersdatacentersinferencellmspatternspolca
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent innovation in large language models (LLMs), and their myriad use-cases have rapidly driven up the compute capacity demand for datacenter GPUs. Several cloud providers and other enterprises have made substantial plans of growth in their datacenters to support these new workloads. One of the key bottleneck resources in datacenters is power, and given the increasing model sizes of LLMs, they are becoming increasingly power intensive. In this paper, we show that there is a significant opportunity to oversubscribe power in LLM clusters. Power oversubscription improves the power efficiency of these datacenters, allowing more deployable servers per datacenter, and reduces the deployment time, since building new datacenters is slow. We extensively characterize the power consumption patterns of a variety of LLMs and their configurations. We identify the differences between the inference and training power consumption patterns. Based on our analysis of these LLMs, we claim that the average and peak power utilization in LLM clusters for inference should not be very high. Our deductions align with the data from production LLM clusters, revealing that inference workloads offer substantial headroom for power oversubscription. However, the stringent set of telemetry and controls that GPUs offer in a virtualized environment, makes it challenging to have a reliable and robust power oversubscription mechanism. We propose POLCA, our framework for power oversubscription that is robust, reliable, and readily deployable for GPU clusters. Using open-source models to replicate the power patterns observed in production, we simulate POLCA and demonstrate that we can deploy 30% more servers in the same GPU cluster for inference, with minimal performance loss

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Illusion of Power Capping in LLM Decode: A Phase-Aware Energy Characterisation Across Attention Architectures

    cs.DC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Power capping is illusory in LLM decode as memory-bound operation leaves power headroom untouched on 700 W GPUs, while SM clock locking saves up to 32% energy and three DVFS classes appear across attention types.

  2. Detecting Hidden ML Training With Zero-Overhead Telemetry

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A classifier using NVML telemetry identifies ML training workloads at 98.2% accuracy and retains 43-87% accuracy against the strongest tested adversarial evasions across 9 GPUs and 5 iteration rounds.

  3. nvPAX: Constrained Optimization for Dynamic Power Allocation in Hierarchical and Multi-Tenant Systems

    cs.DC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    nvPAX is a three-phase hybrid QP/LP policy that allocates power in hierarchical multi-tenant datacenters to achieve 98.92% mean satisfaction ratio on production GPU traces while outperforming static and greedy baselines.

  4. CompPow: A Case for Component-level GPU Power Management

    cs.AR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    CompPow makes the case that component-aware power management inside GPUs can yield 10% higher energy efficiency and 5% better performance for ML workloads.