Pith. sign in

REVIEW

SPFL: A Self-purified Federated Learning Method Against Poisoning Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.10607 v1 pith:3O7I2K4S submitted 2023-09-19 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords modelspflattackpoisoningattacksclientslossdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

While Federated learning (FL) is attractive for pulling privacy-preserving distributed training data, the credibility of participating clients and non-inspectable data pose new security threats, of which poisoning attacks are particularly rampant and hard to defend without compromising privacy, performance or other desirable properties of FL. To tackle this problem, we propose a self-purified FL (SPFL) method that enables benign clients to exploit trusted historical features of locally purified model to supervise the training of aggregated model in each iteration. The purification is performed by an attention-guided self-knowledge distillation where the teacher and student models are optimized locally for task loss, distillation loss and attention-based loss simultaneously. SPFL imposes no restriction on the communication protocol and aggregator at the server. It can work in tandem with any existing secure aggregation algorithms and protocols for augmented security and privacy guarantee. We experimentally demonstrate that SPFL outperforms state-of-the-art FL defenses against various poisoning attacks. The attack success rate of SPFL trained model is at most 3$\%$ above that of a clean model, even if the poisoning attack is launched in every iteration with all but one malicious clients in the system. Meantime, it improves the model quality on normal inputs compared to FedAvg, either under attack or in the absence of an attack.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools