Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hydrodynamics of countercurrent flows in a structured packed column: effects of initial wetting and dynamic contact angle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.02266 v1 pith:A45R6FUA submitted 2022-12-31 physics.flu-dyn physics.chem-ph

classification physics.flu-dynphysics.chem-ph
keywords areainterfacialanglecontactsolventaqueouscolumnhysteresis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Computational countercurrent flow investigation in the structured packed column is a multiscale problem. Multiphase flow studies using volume of fluid (VOF) method in the representative elementary unit (REU) of the packed column can insight into the local hydrodynamics such as interfacial area, film thickness, etc. The interfacial area dictates the mass transfer in absorption process and thereby overall efficiency of column. Impacts of solvent's physical properties, liquid loads and static contact angle (SCA) on the interfacial area were examined earlier. In the present study, the dynamic contact angle (DCA) was used to explore the impact of contact angle hysteresis on the interfacial area. DCA has more pronounced impact on the interfacial area (10%) for aqueous solvent of 0.10M Sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The interfacial area shows undulation and does not achieve the pseudo-steady state. In contrary, the interfacial area gets a net pseudo-steady value for the aqueous solvent having 40% monoethanolamine (MEA) by weight. The wetting hysteresis was also explored via simulations conducted with initially dry and wetted sheets. For 0.10M NaOH aqueous solvent, the initially wetted sheets lead to slightly higher value of the interfacial area (10%) as compared to the initially dry sheets at the same liquid load and DCA. As expected, wetting hysteresis reduces with increasing liquid loads. On the other hand, wetting hysteresis is not significant for 40% MEA aqueous solvent which might be lower surface tension and higher viscosity. Overall, the effect of the dynamic contact angle is not pronounced as compared to those found in a flat surface.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools