Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Sensitivity-Aware Amortized Bayesian Inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.11122 v6 pith:DM3C6VIA submitted 2023-10-17 stat.ML cs.LGstat.ME

classification stat.MLcs.LGstat.ME
keywords bayesianinferencesensitivityamortizedanalysessensitivity-awarechoicedata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Sensitivity analyses reveal the influence of various modeling choices on the outcomes of statistical analyses. While theoretically appealing, they are overwhelmingly inefficient for complex Bayesian models. In this work, we propose sensitivity-aware amortized Bayesian inference (SA-ABI), a multifaceted approach to efficiently integrate sensitivity analyses into simulation-based inference with neural networks. First, we utilize weight sharing to encode the structural similarities between alternative likelihood and prior specifications in the training process with minimal computational overhead. Second, we leverage the rapid inference of neural networks to assess sensitivity to data perturbations and preprocessing steps. In contrast to most other Bayesian approaches, both steps circumvent the costly bottleneck of refitting the model for each choice of likelihood, prior, or data set. Finally, we propose to use deep ensembles to detect sensitivity arising from unreliable approximation (e.g., due to model misspecification). We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in applied modeling problems, ranging from disease outbreak dynamics and global warming thresholds to human decision-making. Our results support sensitivity-aware inference as a default choice for amortized Bayesian workflows, automatically providing modelers with insights into otherwise hidden dimensions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Bayesian Inference of Discretization Error Means in ODEs via Ensemble Kalman Filtering

    math.NA 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Bayesian state-space model with an Ensemble Kalman Filter infers the mean of ODE discretization errors from noisy observations, using a step-size-dependent Markov prior whose convergence is proven.

  2. Simulation-Based Inference: A Practical Guide

    stat.ML 2025-08 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A practical tutorial for simulation-based inference, with a structured workflow, reusable code, and three worked examples validated by calibration diagnostics.

Pith tools