Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Understanding Generative AI in Art: An Interview Study with Artists on G-AI from an HCI Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.13149 v1 pith:6PNXVSMJ submitted 2023-10-19 cs.HC

Jingyu Shi , Rahul Jain , Runlin Duan , Karthik Ramani This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords artistsg-aiunderstandingartisticconcernsgenerativeinterviewsresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (G-AI) has changed the landscape of creative arts with its power to compose novel artwork and thus brought ethical concerns. Despite the efforts by prior works to address these concerns from technical and societal perspectives, there exists little discussion on this topic from an HCI point of view, considering the artists as human factors. We sought to investigate the impact of G-AI on artists, understanding the relationship between artists and G-AI, in order to motivate the underlying HCI research. We conducted semi-structured interviews with artists ($N=25$) from diverse artistic disciplines involved with G-AI in their artistic creation. We found (1) a dilemma among the artists, (2) a disparity in the understanding of G-AI between the artists and the AI developers(3) a tendency to oppose G-AI among the artists. We discuss the future opportunities of HCI research to tackle the problems identified from the interviews.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Exploratory Study on Multi-modal Generative AI in AR Storytelling

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper maps how storytellers prefer to use AI-generated text, audio, images, videos, and 3D content to augment AR stories, based on a 223-video analysis and two user studies with 30 participants.

  2. Dialogue with the Machine and Dialogue with the Art World: Evaluating Generative AI for Culturally-Situated Creativity

    cs.CY 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A qualitative evaluation method pairing artist-to-expert dialogue with hands-on generative AI experimentation yields culturally situated critiques and design recommendations.

  3. Somesite I Used To Crawl: Awareness, Agency and Efficacy in Protecting Content Creators From AI Crawlers

    cs.HC 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Most professional artists lack the awareness and ability to use robots.txt, many hosting platforms do not let them edit it, and a substantial share of AI assistant crawlers ignore the protocol.

  4. GenTune: Toward Traceable Prompts to Improve Controllability of Image Refinement in Environment Design

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GenTune improves AI image refinement by tracing image regions back to prompt labels and allowing element-level, semantic-guided edits.

  5. Investigating Creativity in Humans and Generative AI Through Circles Exercises

    cs.HC 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using the Circles Exercise, the authors report that both humans and generative AI concentrate their drawings in a narrow set of categories, and Chain-of-Thought prompting does not substantially broaden that range.

Pith tools