The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2310.17480 · v2 · pith:IZY5MUNP · submitted 2023-10-26 · physics.plasm-ph · astro-ph.SR· physics.space-ph

Electron Energization in Reconnection: Eulerian versus Lagrangian Perspectives

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:IZY5MUNPrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
keywords energizationelectronreconnectioneulerianperspectiveaccelerationanalysesgkeyll
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Particle energization due to magnetic reconnection is an important unsolved problem for myriad space and astrophysical plasmas. Electron energization in magnetic reconnection has traditionally been examined from a particle, or Lagrangian, perspective using particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. Guiding-center analyses of ensembles of PIC particles have suggested that Fermi (curvature drift) acceleration and direct acceleration via the reconnection electric field are the primary electron energization mechanisms. However, both PIC guiding-center ensemble analyses and spacecraft observations are performed in an Eulerian perspective. For this work, we employ the continuum Vlasov-Maxwell solver within the Gkeyll simulation framework to re-examine electron energization from a kinetic continuum, Eulerian, perspective. We separately examine the contribution of each drift energization component to determine the dominant electron energization mechanisms in a moderate guide-field Gkeyll reconnection simulation. In the Eulerian perspective, we find that the diamagnetic and agyrotropic drifts are the primary electron energization mechanisms away from the reconnection x-point, where direct acceleration dominates. We compare the Eulerian (Vlasov Gkeyll) results with the wisdom gained from Lagrangian (PIC) analyses.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.