Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Nash or Stackelberg? -- A comparative study for game-theoretic AV decision-making

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.20009 v1 pith:7J2LNLNY submitted 2023-10-30 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords gamesgamedecision-makingrespectivelyclassescomparativeconductedgame-theoretic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper studies game-theoretic decision-making for autonomous vehicles (AVs). A receding horizon multi-player game is formulated to model the AV decision-making problem. Two classes of games, including Nash game and Stackelber games, are developed respectively. For each of the two games, two solution settings, including pairwise games and multi-player games, are introduced, respectively, to solve the game in multi-agent scenarios. Comparative studies are conducted via statistical simulations to gain understandings of the performance of the two classes of games and of the two solution settings, respectively. The simulations are conducted in intersection-crossing scenarios, and the game performance is quantified by three metrics: safety, travel efficiency, and computational time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools