Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparing Latency and Power Consumption: Quantum vs. Classical Preprocessing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.04053 v1 pith:M7L35C3F submitted 2023-11-07 quant-ph physics.app-ph

classification quant-phphysics.app-ph
keywords consumptionpowerfuturelatencyopticaladvantagesdecodingelectronic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Low latency and low power consumption are the main goals for our future networks. Fiber optics are already widely used for their faster speed. We want to investigate if optical decoding has further advantages to reaching future goals. We have investigated and compared the decoding latency and power consumption of an optical chip and its electronic counterpart built with MOSFETs. We have found that optical processing has a speed and power consumption benefit. For future networks and real-time applications, this can bring huge advantages over our current electronic processors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools