Pith. sign in

REVIEW

MCMC to address model misspecification in Deep Learning classification of Radio Galaxies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08243 v1 pith:7M4EEK3K submitted 2023-11-14 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.GA
keywords radiodeepinferencelearningposteriorvariationalbayesianbnns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The radio astronomy community is adopting deep learning techniques to deal with the huge data volumes expected from the next-generation of radio observatories. Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) provide a principled way to model uncertainty in the predictions made by deep learning models and will play an important role in extracting well-calibrated uncertainty estimates from the outputs of these models. However, most commonly used approximate Bayesian inference techniques such as variational inference and MCMC-based algorithms experience a "cold posterior effect (CPE)", according to which the posterior must be down-weighted in order to get good predictive performance. The CPE has been linked to several factors such as data augmentation or dataset curation leading to a misspecified likelihood and prior misspecification. In this work we use MCMC sampling to show that a Gaussian parametric family is a poor variational approximation to the true posterior and gives rise to the CPE previously observed in morphological classification of radio galaxies using variational inference based BNNs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools