Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

GPT4Vis: What Can GPT-4 Do for Zero-shot Visual Recognition?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.15732 v2 pith:PWGZEE43 submitted 2023-11-27 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords gpt-4visualrecognitionacrossdatasetszero-shotaccuracydescriptions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper does not present a novel method. Instead, it delves into an essential, yet must-know baseline in light of the latest advancements in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI): the utilization of GPT-4 for visual understanding. Our study centers on the evaluation of GPT-4's linguistic and visual capabilities in zero-shot visual recognition tasks: Firstly, we explore the potential of its generated rich textual descriptions across various categories to enhance recognition performance without any training. Secondly, we evaluate GPT-4's visual proficiency in directly recognizing diverse visual content. We conducted extensive experiments to systematically evaluate GPT-4's performance across images, videos, and point clouds, using 16 benchmark datasets to measure top-1 and top-5 accuracy. Our findings show that GPT-4, enhanced with rich linguistic descriptions, significantly improves zero-shot recognition, offering an average top-1 accuracy increase of 7% across all datasets. GPT-4 excels in visual recognition, outshining OpenAI-CLIP's ViT-L and rivaling EVA-CLIP's ViT-E, particularly in video datasets HMDB-51 and UCF-101, where it leads by 22% and 9%, respectively. We hope this research contributes valuable data points and experience for future studies. We release our code at https://github.com/whwu95/GPT4Vis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do large language vision models understand 3D shapes?

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A large synthetic benchmark shows vision-language models match 3D shapes well across single changes like rotation or texture, but fail when rotation and texture change together, trailing humans by a wide margin.

  2. Med-Banana: Learning Quality-Controlled Medical Image Editing from Success-and-Failure Trajectories

    cs.CV 2025-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Med-Banana-50K is a dataset of ~88K AI-generated medical image edits (accepts and rejects) across 23 diseases, labeled by a single commercial LLM judge with minimal expert validation.

  3. Prompt Engineering for Requirements Engineering: A Literature Review and Roadmap

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The first roadmap-oriented systematic literature review of prompt engineering for requirements engineering analyzes 35 studies and proposes a hybrid taxonomy and research roadmap.

Pith tools