Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Unveiling the Implicit Toxicity in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.17391 v1 pith:Z7766IMZ submitted 2023-11-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords implicittoxictoxicitylanguagellmsoutputsclassifiersattack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The open-endedness of large language models (LLMs) combined with their impressive capabilities may lead to new safety issues when being exploited for malicious use. While recent studies primarily focus on probing toxic outputs that can be easily detected with existing toxicity classifiers, we show that LLMs can generate diverse implicit toxic outputs that are exceptionally difficult to detect via simply zero-shot prompting. Moreover, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) based attacking method to further induce the implicit toxicity in LLMs. Specifically, we optimize the language model with a reward that prefers implicit toxic outputs to explicit toxic and non-toxic ones. Experiments on five widely-adopted toxicity classifiers demonstrate that the attack success rate can be significantly improved through RL fine-tuning. For instance, the RL-finetuned LLaMA-13B model achieves an attack success rate of 90.04% on BAD and 62.85% on Davinci003. Our findings suggest that LLMs pose a significant threat in generating undetectable implicit toxic outputs. We further show that fine-tuning toxicity classifiers on the annotated examples from our attacking method can effectively enhance their ability to detect LLM-generated implicit toxic language. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/thu-coai/Implicit-Toxicity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When the Same Coefficients Reach Different Places: Asymmetric Realizability in Transplanting Tokenizers across Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 'breaker token' embedding can be inert in a donor LLM yet become a high-salience trigger after tokenizer transplant into a base LLM.

  2. Benchmark on Peer Review Toxic Detection: A Challenging Task with a New Dataset

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new 313-sentence peer-review toxicity benchmark shows GPT-4 with detailed instructions reaches a Cohen's Kappa of 0.56 with human judges.

  3. Semantic Loss Guided Data Efficient Supervised Fine Tuning for Safe Responses in LLMs

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A supervised fine-tuning loss that maximizes an Earth-Mover-Distance-style semantic penalty away from model-generated unsafe responses achieves safety with roughly 100 harmful examples.

  4. The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey of LLM safety evaluation that proposes a why/what/where/how taxonomy and catalogs metrics, datasets, benchmarks, evaluators, and frameworks.

Pith tools