The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2312.08962 · v3 · pith:R2HB7AVE · submitted 2023-12-14 · cs.CV

Depicting Beyond Scores: Advancing Image Quality Assessment through Multi-modal Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:R2HB7AVErecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV
keywords depictqaimagemulti-modalqualityassessmentmethodstrainingdata
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We introduce a Depicted image Quality Assessment method (DepictQA), overcoming the constraints of traditional score-based methods. DepictQA allows for detailed, language-based, human-like evaluation of image quality by leveraging Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Unlike conventional Image Quality Assessment (IQA) methods relying on scores, DepictQA interprets image content and distortions descriptively and comparatively, aligning closely with humans' reasoning process. To build the DepictQA model, we establish a hierarchical task framework, and collect a multi-modal IQA training dataset. To tackle the challenges of limited training data and multi-image processing, we propose to use multi-source training data and specialized image tags. These designs result in a better performance of DepictQA than score-based approaches on multiple benchmarks. Moreover, compared with general MLLMs, DepictQA can generate more accurate reasoning descriptive languages. We also demonstrate that our full-reference dataset can be extended to non-reference applications. These results showcase the research potential of multi-modal IQA methods. Codes and datasets are available in https://depictqa.github.io.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DistortBench: Benchmarking Vision Language Models on Image Distortion Identification

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Vision-language models achieve at most 61.9% accuracy on identifying image distortion types and severities, falling short of human majority-vote performance at 65.7%.